Skip to content

Lesson 3.2 - Abnormal Flow Review

Sometimes the platform is healthy, quote source connections are stable and execution latency looks normal, but a group of accounts still requires closer review.

This does not mean the clients have done anything wrong. It means the Dealing Room should collect evidence and determine whether the flow creates execution, pricing or risk concerns.

After this lesson, you should be able to:

  • Explain what an abnormal-flow review is.
  • Separate client profitability from evidence of execution weakness.
  • Understand basic indicators such as holding time, short-term price movement after execution and account correlation.
  • Escalate suspected patterns without making unsupported accusations.

What Is Abnormal Flow?

Abnormal flow means repeated order behavior that needs review because it may be connected to pricing, latency or execution conditions.

In simple terms: do not ask "Did the client make money?" first. Ask "Is there a repeated pattern, and what evidence supports it?"

It is not defined by one profitable trade. It is also not defined by a client simply being fast, active or profitable.

Review Signals

Signal What It May Indicate
Very short holding time Strategy depends on very small timing windows
Repeated favorable post-trade movement Price often moves in the client's favor shortly after execution
Event concentration Activity clusters around news, opens or unstable pricing periods
Cross-account similarity Several accounts show similar timing, symbols or behavior
One-sided execution outcome Execution results are consistently favorable in one direction
Platform timing gap Orders appear around pricing or latency weaknesses

No single signal is enough. A review should look for a repeated pattern across several indicators.

Evidence Package

A useful review package includes:

  • Client and account group
  • Symbol and time window
  • Holding-time distribution
  • 1s, 5s and 30s short-term price movement after execution
  • Quote and execution timestamps
  • Slippage, rejects and fill quality
  • Account, device, IP or strategy correlation where permitted
  • Market context at the time

Language Standard

Use neutral wording:

  • "This pattern requires review."
  • "Evidence suggests concentrated short-hold activity."
  • "Several accounts show similar timing around the same symbol."

Avoid unsupported conclusions:

  • "The client is bad."
  • "This proves misconduct."
  • "Profitable clients should be restricted."

Example

A group of accounts trades XAUUSD around a fast market window. Most trades are held under 20 seconds. Several fills show favorable price movement within 5 seconds after execution, and the same accounts repeat the pattern on multiple days.

Practical Scenario: Fast-Close / Seconds-Order Review

Scenario

A UID controls several MT accounts. During two news windows, those accounts repeatedly open and close XAUUSD positions within a few seconds. The accounts are profitable in the sample, but profitability alone is not the issue. The question is whether the pattern is repeatable, whether it clusters around pricing or latency weakness and whether it creates execution or company-risk concerns.

What to Check

  • UID, MT accounts and account-group relationship.
  • Symbol, order time, close time and holding-time distribution.
  • Quote timestamp, Bid / Ask sequence and post-trade movement at 1s, 5s and 30s.
  • Bridge log, execution time, slippage, reject / timeout and partial-fill behavior.
  • Market context: news, open, rollover, spread widening or chart spike.
  • Whether the same pattern repeats across days, accounts or symbols.

Common Mistake

Calling the client "abnormal" because the client is fast or profitable, without showing repeatable evidence.

Correct Handling

Build an evidence package first. Describe the pattern in neutral language, separate normal market volatility from system or execution weakness, and keep any proposed action within the approved review process.

Escalation Trigger

Escalate to Shift Leader / Risk when the pattern is repeated, concentrated across related accounts, appears near quote or execution weakness, or materially affects exposure, dispute volume or company-risk result.

Key Takeaway

Fast close is a review signal, not a conclusion. The Dealer's job is to preserve evidence and raise the right question, not to label the client.

Key Takeaway

Abnormal-flow review is an evidence exercise. Dealers should identify patterns, document facts and escalate through the approved process. Profit alone is never enough to classify a client or justify action.

Completion Criteria

  • Can explain the key risk or operational objective of this lesson
  • Can identify the required systems, data, or evidence to review
  • Can describe the correct escalation or handling process
  • Has completed Shift Leader / follow-up review or practical confirmation